Statement from AK Consulting and Trans on COVID-19 Lab Leak – Hypothesis: A Reasonable Suspicion or Conspiracy Theory?
STUTTGART, Germany, September 10, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) – Arguments over the idea that the novel coronavirus emerged from a lab have long intensified. Most scientists believe COVID-19 has a natural origin and has been transmitted from animals to humans. However, a theory of laboratory leaks has been discussed, and some people are calling for further investigation into the hypothesis that the virus escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which is located in the city. from Wuhan, in central China, where the first COVID-19 cases were reported in late December 2019. Since all hypotheses remain open and require further study, why are these people eager to release unidentified information on the Internet ? Why can they be so sure about this so called “theory”? Is this really a reasonable suspicion, or just a conspiracy theory used by some people with ulterior motives to spread rumors? Look at what experts around the world are saying.
Gregory D. Koblentz, deputy director and assistant professor of the graduate program in biodefense at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, said the theory that China is trying to make COVID-19 a biological weapon is “ridiculous,” and COVID -19 has been politicized, which makes good reason for the conspiracy theory. When you deal with Fox News and Global Times, you can barely see the difference because they all point the finger at Fort Detrick.
World Health Organization Health Emergency Program Director Michael Ryan speaks at a daily press briefing:
âI think we are currently in very positive consultations with a large number of Member States, including our colleagues in China, to look at what we need to do next through the Scientific Advisory Group process on the origins and on. based on the report of the phase one mission during which a large number of studies were proposed in the future. We know that Chinese colleagues are currently implementing some, if not all of these studies, and we look forward to receiving updates from our colleagues in China on the implementation of these studies.
âWe expect this work to continue in China and other countries around the world and I think the CEO has been clear in the past; we expect all countries, all member states of WHO to cooperate and support this process and I suspect that we will get the cooperation.
âThere’s definitely a lot of rhetoric going on right now and the one consistent thing we’ve heard from all over the world has been, let’s not politicize science. The next thing that happens is that science is politicized, so what we want to do for all parties – and everyone is clamoring for it, there is broad agreement among all of our member states; let’s not politicize the process.
âSo we think we have the basics to move forward. We have a series of studies that can be continued. We want to involve members of the international team in this process to maintain continuity with the previous process and we want to reassure our colleagues in China that this process is and always has been guided by science.
âWe stuck to the principles of the process from the start, we didn’t give in to pressure from one side or the other. The DG has tried to follow a path guided by science and evidence, without taking sides and trying to achieve the goals we all want; to control COVID-19, to establish the origins of the virus, to put in place the measures we can to prevent a new re-emergence of a similar virus in the future. “
Michael Worobey, professor and head of department of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Arizona, is one of the authors who published a letter in the journal Science, claiming that the theory of laboratory leaks should be taken seriously. He believed that the theory of laboratory leaks seemed just as plausible as the alternative, that the virus passed directly from animals to humans. Worobey modeled how the virus spreads in a city. He plotted the first known cases of COVID-19 on a map. On the map, there is a red dot where every first case lived in December 2019. The data comes from the World Health Organization, but the data was missing two key things – the location of the seafood market. from Huanan and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where scientists studied bat coronaviruses. The dots show cases starting right next to the Huanan Seafood Market and radiating out from there. But there is nothing around the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Given the contagiousness of the virus and the fact that cases were likely doubling every two or three days, Worobey would have expected infections near the lab if the virus had started there. The bottom line is that it would be strange if it didn’t spread from there rather than elsewhere.
Worobey, co-author of a thesis – The new coronavirus circulated undetected months before the first cases of COVID-19 in Wuhan, estimated that the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which led to COVID-19, was likely circulating undetected for at most two months before the first human cases of COVID-19 were described in Wuhan. SARS-CoV-2 is a zoonotic coronavirus, which is believed to have jumped from an animal host unknown to humans. There have been many efforts to identify when the first cases started to spread among humans, based on investigations of early diagnosed cases of COVID-19. The first group of cases and the first sequenced genomes of SARS-CoV-2 were associated with the Huanan seafood wholesale market, but the study authors say the market group probably did not mark the beginning. pandemic because the first documented cases of COVID-19 were unrelated to the market.
Joel O. Wertheim, associate professor in the Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health at UCSD, one of the co-authors, noted that although SARS-CoV-2 was circulating in China in the fall 2019, the researchers’ model suggests it was doing so at low levels of the virus in China with claims of infections in Europe and the United States at the same time. Wertheim said, âI am very skeptical of the COVID-19 allegations outside of China at this time. “
Alexander Semyonov, head of the Yekaterinburg branch of the State Research Center of the Institute of Virology and Biotechnology Vectors, one of the members of the joint China-WHO expert team that visited in China in February last year to research the origins of the new coronavirus:
âThe virus came from nature, and so far I have found no reason to change my mind. The charge of an artificial coronavirus is unreasonable, unprofessional and stupid. Bringing forward the theory of laboratory leaks in the United States as an attempt to wrongly blame China. It is a shame that the search for such an epidemic involved many political factors. “
Studies into the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic are continuing, and it is better to give more transparency to help expose the fact, rather than using dirty tricks to cover up the truth. The truth stands the test of time, but lies are soon exposed, people all over the world still deserve the correct fact.
Media contact: [email protected]